apartment(s), cars, houses, or whatever else one might own. This is precisely where MiiMii’s latest allegations come in. In his sixth video about ApoRed, he reveals that insolvency proceedings have been initiated against his assets. Some of you may have wonder while reading this to what extent this public dispute is even relevant under data protection law. Up to the video mentioned above, I would agree, since insolvency proceedings are made public and the information is therefore already public. However, MiiMii doesn’t stop there and, in his ninth video, apparently publishes copies of ApoRed’s bank statements, his wife’s ID card, and, among other things, documents from the job center. I’ll examine below whether this was compliant with data protection regulations or whether MiiMii violated the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) MiiMii vs. ApoRed.
The right to informational self-determination MiiMii vs. ApoRed
Data protection primarily means protecting informational self-determination. It means that every natural person can, in principle, ireland business fax list decide for themselves about the disclosure of their personal data. This fundamental right was develop by the Federal Constitutional Court from Article 1, Paragraph 1 and Article 2, Paragraph 1 of the Basic Law in the context of the so-call census ruling. Therefore, it is important for the following consideration whether or not MiiMii violated the fundamental rights of other people.
When is the GDPR applicable?
For data protection law, and thus also the GDPR, personal data is all . Information relating to an identifi or identifiable natural person. Simply put, most of what we are currently this means that personal data is all data. That can be attribut, directly or with the aid of tools, to an individual.
It is easy to assume that the publish documents contain personal data, since even though some documents have been black out, a personal reference can easily be establish using the information provid by MiiMii.
On what legal basis may personal data be process?
Undoubtedly, ApoR or his wife did not consent to the processing of the personal data. A contract also appears to be a non-consensical legal basis. Likewise, it is not apparent that MiiMii is acting in accordance with a legal obligation. Furthermore, botswana business directory it seems unrealistic that MiiMii would . Protect the vital interests of ApoRed and Co. by publishing the data. From a non-legal perspective, one could view the publication of the documents as a task in the public interest. However, this legal basis refers to processing by government agencies, not by private individuals like MiiMii.
The only remaining anchor is Article 6 (1) (f) GDPR. This requires that MiiMii had a legitimate interest in the data do not outweigh MiiMii’s interests.
What is the purpose of data processing?
Since processing may only be carri out for a strictly specific purpose, the question arises as to MiiMii’s purpose in processing personal data, in the form of publishing it. While this is a matter of speculation, it can be assum that MiiMii intends to use the videos and the associat publications of documents to reveal ApoRed’s (supposedly) true financial situation.